The word ‘Cyber ‘ and its comparative ‘dot.com ‘ are likely the most stylish words in the full view of the English vocabulary today. In the information age, there is rapid development of computing machine, telecommunication and other engineerings has lead to emerging of a new signifiers offense that is called a ‘Cyber Crime ‘ . Cyber Crime is holding no boundary and can impact any state is the universe.[ 1 ]

Cyber Crime may be defined as “ Any condemnable activity that uses a computing machine either as an instrumentality, mark or a agency for perpetuating farther offenses comes within the scope of cyber offense ”[ 2 ]Cyber offense encompasses any condemnable act covering with computing machines and webs. In the simple words we can state that Cyber Crime are those offense which are done thorough the aid of the telecommunication and cyberspace installations with the intent of act uponing the operation of computing machine or the computing machine system. Additionally, cyber offense besides includes traditional offenses conducted through the Internet. For illustration ; hate offenses, telemarketing and Internet fraud, individuality larceny, and recognition card history larcenies are considered to be cyber offenses when the illegal activities are committed through the usage of a computing machine and the Internet.[ 3 ]Cyber Crime is a really serious menace for the clip coming and one of the most hard offenses to dispute.

The turning danger from offenses committed against computing machines, or against information on computing machines, is get downing to claim attending in national capitals. In most states around the universe, nevertheless, bing Torahs are likely to be unenforceable against such offenses. This deficiency of legal protection means that concerns and authoritiess must trust entirely on proficient steps to protect themselves from those who would steal, deny entree to, or destruct valuable information.

Cyber Crime is different from Conventional Crime

The most of import inquiry that arises is whether there is any difference between Cyber offense and other conventional offense. Cyber Crime is different from conventional offense. It differs in these facets:

First, Cyber Crimes ever involve usage of computing machines.

Second, it can be committed in the legal power without the condemnable being physically present in it.

Third, Cyber Crimes are ever non clearly illegal as compared to conventional offenses. This is because of deficiency of jurisprudence penalizing them.

Fourthly, it requires merely little resources as compared to the attendant harm caused by the committee of the offense.

Statutory PROVISONS

The first measure in the field of cyber jurisprudence was the Model Law which was drafted under the United Nation Commission on International Trade Law, 1986. Then, United Nations General Assembly on 30th January, 1999 passed a declaration ( A/RES/51/62 ) to modulate e-commerce through unvarying set of Torahs applicable to its member states. Bing signatory, the Indian Parliament, in order to give consequence to the UN General Assembly declaration, passed the Information Technology Act, 2000 on 17th May 2000.[ 4 ]The preamble of the Act states that the aim of the Act is to legalize e-commerce and farther amend the Indian Penal Code 1860, the Indian Evidence Act 1872, the Banker ‘s Book Evidence Act1891 andA the Reserve Bank of India Act 1934 to do them compatible with I.T. Act, 2000.[ 5 ]

Outstanding Feature of the IT Act, 2000 in relation to Cyber Crimes: –

The Act consists of 13 Chapters. It governs jurisprudence associating to Electronic Contract, Electronic record, Digital Signature and the usage of the electronic records and signature in Government records. It besides regulates the activities of Network Service Providers. Broadly speech production, the Information Technology Act 2000 provides for the acknowledgment for the minutess carried out by the agencies of the electronic commercialism which involves the option to the usage of the paper and storage infinite is besides less every bit compared to paper work. The Information Technology Act trades with the assorted cyber offenses in chapters IX & A ; XI.

Punishments and Offences – Cyber Crimes

The chief purpose of this Act is to legalise digital linguistic communication so that people can easy and without fright use the electronic devices to do contract, this contract has been successful to certain extent to command Cyber Crime. This Act besides prescribes certain offenses and punishments to maintain the cheque on the Cyber Crime, the chief cyber offenses with there punishments are: –

Section 65: – Tampering with computing machine beginning paperss. – Whoever wittingly or deliberately conceals, destroy, or alter any computing machine beginning codification used for a computing machine, computing machine programme, computing machine system or computing machine web, when the computing machine beginning codification is required to be kept or maintained by jurisprudence for the clip being in force, shall be punishable with imprisonment up to three old ages, or with all right which may widen up to two hundred thousand rupees, or with both.[ 6 ]This subdivision fundamentally stipulate that any individual with his evil motivation and evil purpose purposefully tamping bars with the computing machine beginnings or of import paperss through the electronic media will be apt under this subdivision.

Section 66: – Choping with Computer System. – ( 1 ) Whoever with the purpose of cause or knowing that is likely to do unlawful loss or harm to the populace or any individual destroys or deletes or alters any information residing in a computing machine resource or diminishes its value or public-service corporation or affects it injuriously by any agencies, commits choping.[ 7 ]Therefore, any individual with his evil purpose purposefully hacks persons computing machine will be held apt under this subdivision.

Section 67: – Publication of information which is obscene in electronic form- Whoever publishes or convey any such information which has some obscene things in it, may be apt under this subdivision with the imprisonment of 10 old ages or mulct of 2 hundred thousand or both.[ 8 ]

Section 70: – Breach of confidentiality and privacy- Maximum imprisonment of 10 old ages.[ 9 ]

But in add-on to above punishments, Section 77 of the I.T. Act states that the punishments and arrogation will non interfere with other penalties. – No punishment imposed or arrogation made under this Act shall forestall the infliction of any other penalty to which the individual affected thereby is apt under any other jurisprudence for the clip being in force.[ 10 ]Under this subdivision the Civil Crimes can be besides made as Criminal Act, as discussed below: –

Computer Network breakage and choping – Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 66 ( 2 ) and Indian Penal Code 441

Child Pornography- Information Technology Act, Section 67 and Indian Penal Code 294

Email Bombing – Information Technology Act, 43 ( vitamin E ) and Indian Penal Code 425-440 and with subdivision 447

Password Sniffing – Information Technology Act, 43 ( a ) , ( g ) , and Indian Penal Code Section 419

Credit Card Fraud – Information Technology Act, Section 443 ( a ) and ( g ) with Indian Penal Code 426,427,447.

Drawbacks:

The Information Technology Act 2000 is doubtless a welcome measure as it is the first statute law that trades with internet minutess and other offenses. However, this Act has proved to be unequal to a certain extent. The assorted loopholes in the Act are-

1. Cyber torts-

The Information Technology Act, 2000 does non trades with offenses like cyber torment, cyber nuisance, and cyber calumny. Further it is besides contended that in future new signifiers of cyber offense will emerge which even need to beA A taken attention of. Therefore India should subscribe the cyber offense convention. However the I.T.Act 2000 read with the Penal Code is capable of covering with these felonies.

2.Ambiguity in the definitions-

The definitions provided in the I.T. Act, 2000 are really equivocal. The definition of choping provided in subdivision 66 of the Act is really broad and capable of misapplication. There is every possibility of this subdivision being misapplied and in fact the Delhi tribunal has misapplied it. The ill-famed go2nextjob has made it really clear that what may be the destiny of a individual who is booked under subdivision 66 or the changeless menace under which the netizens are till s. 66 exists in its present signifier.[ 11 ]Further subdivision 67 is besides obscure to certain extent. It is hard to specify the term lewd information or obscene adult informaA­tion. A Further our inability to cover with the instances of cyber pornographyA has been proved by the Bal Bharati instance.[ 12 ]A A A A A A A

3. Lack of awareness-

One of the of import grounds for the failure of this act is the deficiency of consciousness among people about their rights. Further most of the instances are traveling unreported. If the people are argus-eyed about their rights the jurisprudence decidedly protects their right. E.g. the Delhi high tribunal in October 2002 prevented a individual from selling Microsoft pirated package over an auction site. Achievement was besides made in the instance before the tribunal of metropolitan magistrate Delhi wherein a individual was convicted for online cheating by purchasing Sony merchandises utilizing a stolen recognition card.[ 13 ]

4. Legal power issues-

Legal power is besides one of the problematic issues in the instances of cyber offense due to the really cosmopolitan nature of cyber infinite. With the ever-growing weaponries of cyber infinite the territorial construct seems to disappear. New methods of difference declaration should give manner to the conventionalA methods. The Act of 2000 is really soundless on these issues.

5. Excess territorial application-

Though S.75 provides for extra-territorial operations of this jurisprudence, but they couldA be meaningful merely when backed with commissariats acknowledging orders and warrants forA Information issued by competent governments outside their legal power and step for cooperation for exchange of stuff and grounds of computing machine offenses between jurisprudence enforcement bureaus.

6. Cyber savvy bench-

Cyber savvy Judgess are the demand of the twenty-four hours. Judiciary plays a critical function in determining the passage harmonizing to the order of the twenty-four hours. One such phase, which needs grasp, is the P.I.L. , which the Kerela HighA Court has accepted through an electronic mail. The function of the Judgess in today ‘s word may be gathered by the statement- Judgess carve ‘law is ‘ to ‘law ought to be ‘ . Mr T.K.Vishwanathan, member secretary, Law Commission, has highlightedA the demands for presenting e-courts in India. In his article published in The Hindu he has stated “ if there is one country of Governance where IT can do a immense difference to Indian populace is in the Judicial System ” .

7. Dynamic signifier of cyber crime-

A A Speaking on the dynamic nature of cyber offense FBI Director Louis Freeh has said, “ In short, even though we have markedly improved our capablenesss to contend cyber invasions the job is turning even faster and we are falling farther behind. ” A The ( de ) creativeness of human head can non be checked by any jurisprudence. Thus the lone manner out is the broad building while using the statutory commissariats to cyber offense instances. A

8. The Act does non turn to the issue of protecting privateness online. The Act refers to online privateness in merely two countries, viz. in subdivisions 43 & A ; 72, which is non sufficient. Sections 43 & A ; 72 do non hold any bearing on the misdemeanor of person ‘s privateness in internet.[ 14 ]

9. Internet Service Providers ( ISP ) transmits 3rd party contents from their computing machines to others without any human intercession from the ISP. But IT Act responds to the service supplier ‘s liability by saying that he is non apt. If he proves that the offense or dispute was committed without his cognition or that he had exercised all due diligence to forestall the committee of such offense or dispute.[ 15 ]It is really hard to turn out “ deficiency of cognition ” and “ due diligence ” and these footings have non been explained anyplace in the Act.

10. The Act wholly ignores the rational belongings government, which is the anchor of any e- commercialism dealing.

On August 29, 2005, the Government of India released the Final Report of the Expert Committee on Amendments to IT Act 2000. However, it besides did non look into cyber offenses and advocated for the retainment of same penalty under the Act.

Cyber Crime Laws in Different states.

Network information system is being quickly adopted by authorities and concern worldwide to better the communicating operation control and finally competitory as now a twenty-four hours ‘s whole universe is running on the computing machines therefore it has taken outgrowth on Cyber Crime. Reliance on these systems, where the cyberspace exist as the primary infrastature such offense is likely to increase.

Cyber Crime is an emerging job all over the universe. But really few states have updated Torahs on cyber offense. McConnell International surveyed its planetary web of informational engineering to find the province of cyber security Torahs around the universe.[ 16 ]The surveyed showed that most of the states do n’t hold any updated Torahs to battle cyber offense. The surveyed showed the undermentioned consequence[ 17 ]:

Figure 1 shows the extent of advancement on updating Cyber Crime Torahs in assorted states. This chart shows that merely 10 states have well or to the full updated Torahs, whereas 33 states have no updated Torahs on cyber offense. Nine states have partly updated Torahs. Therefore, bulk of states do n’t hold updated Torahs on cyber offense.

The states are bit by bit seeking to upgrade their Torahs on cyber offenses. Of the 33 states with no updated Torahs in topographic point, 13 indicated that advancement toward the acceptance of updated statute law to battle cyber offense is underway. Seven of these 13 states are in Africa or the Middle East, bespeaking that, although these parts have non yet adequately addressed the issue of cyber offense, many states are cognizant that action is needed. Figure 3 offers a sum-up of work in advancement.[ 18 ]

India is placed in the class of the well or to the full updated Torahs on cyber offense. However, India should do the necessary alterations in the Information Technology Act, 2000 and do its jurisprudence as an ideal for the universe.

Suggestion

The legislative assembly should do the necessary amendments in the Information Technology Act, 2000.

The Information Technology Act, 2000 must be equipped to cover with offenses like cyber torment, cyber nuisance, and cyber calumny.

The definitions of relevant footings like hacking should be made clear.

Legal power is besides one of the problematic issues in the instances of cyber offense due to the really cosmopolitan nature of cyber infinite. With the ever-growing weaponries of cyber infinite the territorial construct seems to disappear. New methods of difference declaration should give manner to the conventionalA methods. The Act of 2000 should be amended to cover with these issues.

The Act should be equipped to turn to the issue of protecting privateness online.

The Act wholly ignores the rational belongings government, which is the anchor of any e- commercialism dealing. The Act should besides be equipped to cover with Intellectual Property Rights.

The legislative assembly besides has to do necessary alterations in related Acts of the Apostless.

The Copyright Act, 1957 needs a new visual aspect to command copyright misdemeanors over the cyberspace. As this act was brought into force when installations of cyberspace ne’er existed in our state, therefore this act needs to convey alterations harmonizing to the alteration in demand.

The Trade Mark Act, 1999 besides needs amendment to enable the hallmark holders to acquire the right over sphere name and prevent other trademark misdemeanor on cyberspace.

The Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 needs an amendment to implement the latest engineerings.

The Companies Act, 1956 and the SEBI Act need an amendment in order to acquire incorporated in the new practical market.

The Indian Post Office Act, 1888 and the Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act of 1993 should be appropriately modified in the visible radiation of the turning importance of the engineerings.

The Income Tax Act, 1961 demands to be amended after determination on the method of taxing the e-commerce gross.

Though cyber Torahs have grown well and have tried to cover the turning dimensions of cyber offenses but, till now it is at infant phase and it has stat mis to travel to achieve the full growing. Following are the suggestions that can be implemented for accomplishing the said end[ 19 ]: –

Awareness about the cyberspace should be made compulsory to the cyberspace users.

Trained functionaries good trained and equipt constabulary force, research workers with the expert cognition in computing machine forensic should be appointed to achieve to the grudges of the plaintiff.

ISPs should and cyber coffeehouse should take sensible steps to protect client information from unauthorised entree.

Customers should with the criterions and acceptable signifiers of behaviour which reflects the jurisprudence turn toing cyber offenses.

Duty should be taken by the authorities section for the hurt caused to the clients due to authorities act.

Different sphere names should given based on the content which it displays to assorted web sites.

Aid should be established for international co-ordination in tracking the felons.

Appointment of Cyber Regulation Appellate Tribunal, Controller of Certifying Authorities and Adjudicating officers to administrate the system internationally should be done so that merely one jurisprudence can regulate the universe as a whole.

Decision

The turning danger from offenses committed against computing machines, or against information on computing machines, is get downing to claim attending in national capitals. In most states around the universe, nevertheless, bing Torahs are likely to be unenforceable against such offenses. This deficiency of legal protection means that concerns and authoritiess must trust entirely on proficient steps to protect themselves from those who would steal, deny entree to, or destruct valuable information. Indian Government should take the enterprise and do amendments in the Information Technology Act, 2000 to accommodate the altering times.

Capacity of human head is unfathomable. It is non possible to extinguish cyber offense from the cyber infinite. It is rather possible to look into them. History is the informant that no statute law has succeeded in wholly extinguishing offense from the Earth. The lone possible measure is to do people aware of their rights and responsibilities ( to describe offense as a corporate responsibility towards the society ) and further doing the application of the Torahs more rigorous to look into offense. Undoubtedly, the Act is a historical measure in the cyber universe, but there is a demand to convey alterations in the Information Technology Act, 2000 to do it more effectual to battle cyber offense.

Appendix