Introduction

The International Monetary Fund came into formation in July 1944 when representatives of 45 states met together in the town of Bretton Woods, New Hampshire in north-east of United States. They agreed to set up a model for the international economic cooperation after the Second World War. It was believed that such a model for the economic cooperation was necessary to avoid the return of the black economic policies which lead to the great depression for the countries.In December 1945 International Monetary Fund officially came into being when 29 member provinces signed the articles of understanding and on 1st March 1947 IMF began its operations. The chief intent of IMF was to vouch stableness of economic growing and the care of life criterions and hence to carry through this intent it was really of import for the states to interchange goods and services from each other. The IMF if besides known as a societal establishment, whose cardinal function is to supply primary societal goods: entree to currency militias, cost to such entree, exhaustible societal resource and trade currencies.

ROLE OF IMF

In 1970 ‘s the Bankss lent billion of dollars to the poorer states specifically to Latin America and Asia but this procedure of loaning of money lead to crisis. In 1982 Mexico announced that it could no longer pay the money owed until a particular agreement had been made that allowed it to prorogue the payment and borrow back portion of its involvement. Following Mexico,

Brazil, Argentina and other little states besides found themselves self caught in the same job. If we see the place from a broader position it could be observed that the developments on the international economic in 1970s exposed the economic troubles which were being faced by developing universe. Both the internal and external jobs of the developing states were exposed ; the internal jobs of the developing states manifested themselves in turning economic shortages and lifting in external current history shortages. External factors included crisp addition in the existent monetary values of the energy merchandises, fluctuations in the universe market monetary values of primary merchandises produced by the non oil developing states and slow growing in the industrial states.

In this state of affairs the Bretton Woods establishments, World Bank and International Monetary Fund ( IMF ) argued that the jobs were being caused chiefly by misdirection in the development states. As a consequence of this sufferance of economic instability by the developing states the establishments launched stabilisation and structural plans to get the better of the jobs of macroeconomic deformations and to beef up the economic construction in these states. The function of IMF has been transforming smartly since 1970s, when the gilded criterion fixed rate system was changed to a flexible exchange rate the original intent of IMF to keep the exchange rate alliance was departed.

In 1980s IMF gave more attending towards the Latin America debt job via structural accommodations. In early 1990 ‘s it was forced to play a function by assisting to organize market- based economic systems, by the terminal it was besides covering with fiscal sector reforms and systems fiscal crisis. However now IMF in poorer developing states has been helping to set up macroeconomic conditions for the poorness decrease. With the smartly altering function of

IMF the client base has besides been affected ; the rank has increased from 45 to 185 states today. However the new states which joined the IMF rank are more economically diverse and have wider demands and precedences than the bing members.

Initially IMF was runing as a Credit brotherhood, all the members ‘ provinces use to borrow from clip to clip, Nowadays the IMF have structural creditors and debitors. The developed states are less likely to borrow from the IMF and prefer to borrow straight from the private market, which does non let IMF to interfere in their policies. Where as the development states are more likely to borrow continuously from IMF and must subject to their policy demands, nevertheless nowadays the IMF programme is largely conducted in developing states and emerging market states.

Criticism ON ROLE OF IMF

IMF plays a critical function to better and brace fiscal crisis, nevertheless its function has been under great examination and has been criticised for many grounds. It has come into treatment that IMF loan causes more harm than good to member provinces. Many criticised on the IMF ‘s insisting on deflationary financial policy and higher involvement rates. It was argued that IMF turned a minor crisis into a major one by making economic recession with unemployment rates in the states like Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia.

IMF has been demanding for the same economic policies for everyone regardless of the state of affairs. Devaluation of the exchange rates may assist many states but it does n’t intend it ‘s ever the solution. Some policies like denationalization and deregulating may work better in

developed states but will be more hard to be implemented in the development states. It has been argued that IMF takes off the political liberty of the states. States such as Jamaica states that it takes off ability for the member provinces to make up one’s mind their national policies, alternatively they have to follow the economic dictates of an unelected organic structure. IMF has besides been criticised by free market economic expert, they argue that IMF ‘s intercession creates moral jeopardy. They intervene on the bases of hapless information and fail to cover with economic jobs ; it is argued that states should take the duties themselves instead than giving their duties to IMF.

Articles OF AGREEMENT

The IMF ‘s fund authorization is based on an international pact called Articles of Agreement which came into being in December 1945.The articles of understanding outline the chief intent of the fund, nevertheless the articles of understanding have been amended three times in the last 47 old ages but article one which states the chief intent has ne’er been altered. IMF observes the conformity of its members provinces with certain duties specified in the articles of understanding ; it is regulative in nature instead than fiscal. These articles lay down the regulations which are of great importance in structural growing and map of the IMF, the financess keeps a cheque that regulations are non merely being followed by the member provinces but besides the fund is working in conformity with the regulations.

By puting down a complete set of regulations in the articles of understanding the fund makes certain that its chief intent and process is consecutive frontward without making any confusion for the member ‘s provinces. Article one states the intent of the IMF in a really broad chance as it was states by Lastra:

“ the wide record has authorized the establishment to digest over the old ages, seting and re seting its function in response to varied economic fortunes ” .

By fall ining the IMF and accepting the articles of understanding member provinces accepts the duties that limit their pecuniary sovereignty and in return they receive benefits, nevertheless if the member provinces comply with the needed conditions of the understanding they receive fiscal aid in crisis state of affairss. However it could be seen that there is a common duty on the both sides to cover with the fortunes as required by IMF process, which helps for international cooperation.