The Preamble of the Securities and Exchange Board of India describes the basic maps of the Securities and Exchange Board of India as“ … to protect the involvements of investors in securities and to advance the development of, and to modulate the securities market and for affairs connected therewith or incidental thereto ”( Source – hypertext transfer protocol: // )

Powers of SEBI with relevant illustrations

As explained in the above subdivisions, SEBI’s primary motivation is to protect the involvements of the investors and to guarantee the appropriate operation of the securities market. Such a organic structure without power would be a toothless tiger. SEBI enjoys it’s powers via the SEBI act 1992. Such powers were provided to SEBI in 1995 via an amendment to the SEBI act 1992. The power it obtains via the act can be categorized into 3 wide countries

  1. Power to Issue Directions
  2. Power to Investigate
  3. Power to Enforce ( Cease & A ; Desist Proceedings )

( Source – hypertext transfer protocol: // )

In the subdivisions below, we’d explore each of the above countries alongwith relevant illustrations of the same based on information publically available.

Power to Issue Directions

As per Section 11B of SEBI Act 1992, SEBI can publish waies to procure the involvements of the investors and/or proper operation of securities market or for appropriate direction of entities that fall within it’s scopes. Such waies can be issued to persons or companies as appropriate. SEBI can publish such waies after appropriate question has been made in to the affairs. ( Source – hypertext transfer protocol: // )

Some instances where SEBI has ordered such waies post questions have been shared below.

Attachment of Deposit Money of A G Shares and Securities

In an order issued on 16th Jun 2014, SEBI directed NSE to remit the sedimentation money of A G Shares and Securities in favor of the regulator. A G Shares and Securities had to pay SEBI towards outstanding turnover fees but it failed to make so. With this background, SEBI issued the way to NSE to guarantee that it recovers the money every bit good as other market participants are cognizant of such punishments incase of such state of affairss. This way was issued in exercising of powers conferred under Section 28 A ( 1 ) ( B ) , 11 ( 2 ) ( ia ) of the SEBI Act 1992.

( Source – hypertext transfer protocol: // )

Vibgyor to return money

On 20th Feb 2014, SEBI directed Vibgyor Allied Infrastructure Ltd. to return all the money raised by it’s boosters from the investors within 3 months after factoring in the involvement due presuming an involvement rate of 15 % . SEBI found out that Vibgyor had raised money from investors via agencies that were non within the statutory demands of the jurisprudence. SEBI as portion of it’s question found out that the inside informations of most of the investors were fake and suspected the money used to purchase such bonds were likely non coming from legitimate investors. In order to guarantee that the echt investor’s involvements are non impacted and to guarantee that the fiscal system is non misused, it issued such a directive to the laminitiss of the company.

( Source – hypertext transfer protocol: // # .U58aavmSxyw )

Power to Investigate

As per Section 11C of SEBI Act 1992, SEBI can look into persons or companies to procure the involvements of investors and/or to guarantee appropriate operation of the securities market. The board need non hold concrete cogent evidence to get down such an probe and a sensible uncertainty would do to originate the probe. As portion of it’s probes, SEBI can bespeak assorted paperss from the persons or companies and they would be bound to supply such certification to SEBI, which SEBI can maintain upto 6 months with them. SEBI can besides direct persons to look personally before the board or it’s representatives neglecting which the person would be apt for gaol upto one twelvemonth or a mulct of 1 Crore Rupees or both. Further any hold beyond the initial day of the month of visual aspect would necessitate the single to pay up to 5 Lakh Rupees per twenty-four hours doing it one of the stiffest all right under the Indian jurisprudence. Such rigorous fines/punishment shows the power that SEBI genuinely enjoys. ( Source – hypertext transfer protocol: // )

In the paragraphs below, we discuss in item instances where such probes were carried out by SEBI.

Investigate Credit Suisse for Insider Trading

On 5th Jun 2014, SEBI ordered an probe against Hong Kong based plus fund Factorial Capital Management Ltd for short merchandising L & A ; T Finance Holdings Ltd. SEBI had sensible belief that Factorial had entree to insider information about a possible portion sale at a discounted monetary value in future and took a heavy short place. On 13th Mar 2014, Factorial bought sharply L & A ; T Finance Derivative at a monetary value of Rs. 79.15/- per portion. This individual derived function accounted for 84.15 % of the full outstanding place doing this an obvious outlier. At the terminal of the twenty-four hours the discounted portion sell proclamation was made with the monetary value fixed at Rs. 70/- per portion. Factorial is accused of doing close to Rs20 Crore as portion of this trade. At the clip of accusal, SEBI didn’t have concrete information to turn out it’s instance but it had a sensible uncertainty based on the dealing type and volume and the net income made by the plus direction company, particularly when the company didn’t have any important exposure to this peculiar security before. If proven guilty, Factorial would hold to pay up to 3 times the net income it made from the trade. Factorial interpreter maintained that Factorial didn’t do anything incorrect and they would collaborate with SEBI in the full probe procedure. Factorial has 21 yearss to react to the orders of SEBI but till the clip the probe is completed, they have been barred from take parting in Indian security markets.

( Source – hypertext transfer protocol: // )

Investigate for Suspicious/Insider Trading Transactions Post Election

Post the 2014 Lok Sabha elections RBI, SEBI and other establishments had created different commissions to supervise any leery or insider trading activities. On 16th May, SEBI noticed unnatural motion of the market and ordered an probe of 30 entities that included some of the fiscal establishments every bit good as high net worth persons. SEBI had created 2 separate commissions to supervise such trades. While one of the commission was supervising the consequences, another was maintaining a check on the monetary value motion. SENSEX jumped by 2,100 points within one minute of trading and trading had to be halted to forestall a big volatility. ( Source – hypertext transfer protocol: // )

Investigate HDFC Mutual Fund for Front Running

Before we go into the inside informations of the instance, it is of import to understand the construct of “Front Running” for the benefit of the readers. Front running agencies that an entity places an order in forepart of another entity who has a definite purpose of geting certain specific securities. For Ex-husband: – If entity B wants to purchase 100, 000 portions of a company and person has an advanced information about it, so another entity A could technically purchase these portions before and increasing the monetary value of the portion. This would intend that entity B will be purchasing the securities at a higher monetary value. Another attack could be the entity A could cite a higher monetary value to sell similar figure of measures and do a net income. The net income would be high if entity B happens to be a big fiscal establishment.

In 2007, SEBI found happenings of such trading by a peculiar trader working for HDFC named Nilesh Kapadia in collusion with another 3 persons. SEBI initiated a investigation that lasted about 7 old ages demoing the finding of SEBI to bring out the truth. As portion of it’s probe SEBI non merely gathered the inside informations of the fiscal dealing but besides leveraged it’s power to roll up transcripts of the phone conversations between the persons. In this peculiar instance Nilesh Kapadia would tip his college mate about an approaching trade that he will be doing on behalf of HDFC so that his friend could first put the orders and in the procedure doing a big net income that was shared between them. SEBI’s thorough probe successfully proved the allegations and even though ab initio Mr. Nilesh refused of any error he finally told the truth when faced with incontrovertible grounds that included phone conversations.

( Source – hypertext transfer protocol: // )

Power to Enforce ( Cease & A ; Desist Proceedings )

As per Section 11D of SEBI Act 1992, SEBI can halt people or companies to merchandise or carry on concern to procure the involvements of investors and/or to guarantee appropriate operation of the securities market. ( Source – hypertext transfer protocol: // )

As explained under the above probe subdivision, SEBI eventually barred the persons involved in front terminal running frauds from take parting in the Indian securities market. SEBI can exclude entities from covering in the Indian securities market even when they are under probe like it did for Factorial.

Bar Mrs. Reena Bansal from Trading

On 9th Jun 2014, SEBI barred Mrs. Reena Bansal from any trading in the Indian securities system every bit good as instructed both NSDL and CDSL non to put to death any instructions from her. The order was chiefly issued to forestall her from moving as a sub-broker. While she was non a registered agent with SEBI, all her minutess ( buying/selling of portions every bit good as money transportations ) had ample grounds to demo that she was moving as a agent. She was issued a summon that was undelivered and since she didn’t respond within the stipulated clip, she was barred from making any minutess.

( Source – hypertext transfer protocol: // )


In Nov 2009, SEBI ordered Dr. N V Krishna non to merchandise straight or indirectly in the India securities market. It besides asked him non to publish any online or offline solicitation from public about any information or investing. What SEBI noticed in this peculiar instance is that Dr. N V Krishna was publicizing via his on-line web logs that he can bring forth high return based on his entree to certain insider information. This was clearly against the involvements of the market and therefore SEBI barred him from take parting in any dealing.

( Source – hypertext transfer protocol: // )


In presence of a batch of deceitful activities that happened in early 1890ss, it was indispensable that a regulator is needed to supervise the Indian securities sector. Since it’s origin SEBI has done a antic occupation in look intoing a batch of such activities and has taken a batch of persons and companies to task. While this is deserving foregrounding, SEBI has besides been alleged to be a spot cavalier in certain scenarios. Recently SAT sent a signal in this way to SEBI. In decision, while SEBI has been making a great occupation, it needs to guarantee that it doesn’t cross a batch of boundaries doing itself to acquire overwhelmed with counter instances and fail. India needs a regulative organic structure like SEBI to protect the involvements of the investors every bit good as appropriate operation of the stock market.